Hi,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 08:20:02AM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 16:23 +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:24:09PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > > Hi Victor,
> > >
> > > I put some questions/comments inline
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2016-05-30
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 16:23 +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:24:09PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > Hi Victor,
> >
> > I put some questions/comments inline
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 11:54 +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> > > By introducing a flush_callback such as
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:24:09PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> I put some questions/comments inline
>
> On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 11:54 +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> > By introducing a flush_callback such as SpiceFileTransferTaskFlushCb
> > SpiceFileTransferTask becomes agnostic on
By introducing a flush_callback such as SpiceFileTransferTaskFlushCb
SpiceFileTransferTask becomes agnostic on how channel-main flushes
the data.
The spice_file_transfer_task_flush_done() function is now introduced
to tell SpiceFileTransferTask that flushing is over and we can read
more data if
