On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:51:52PM +0300, Uri Lublin wrote:
> On 04/16/2018 01:13 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > At the moment, we'll unconditionally release the guest QXL resources in
> > red_put_drawable() even if red_get_drawable() failed and did not
> > initialize drawable->release_info_ext
On 04/16/2018 01:13 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
At the moment, we'll unconditionally release the guest QXL resources in
red_put_drawable() even if red_get_drawable() failed and did not
initialize drawable->release_info_ext properly.
This commit checks the QXLReleaseInfo in release_info_ext is
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 07:25:19AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > At the moment, we'll unconditionally release the guest QXL resources in
> > red_put_drawable() even if red_get_drawable() failed and did not
> > initialize drawable->release_info_ext properly.
> > This commit checks the
>
> At the moment, we'll unconditionally release the guest QXL resources in
> red_put_drawable() even if red_get_drawable() failed and did not
> initialize drawable->release_info_ext properly.
> This commit checks the QXLReleaseInfo in release_info_ext is non-0
> before attempting to release it.
At the moment, we'll unconditionally release the guest QXL resources in
red_put_drawable() even if red_get_drawable() failed and did not
initialize drawable->release_info_ext properly.
This commit checks the QXLReleaseInfo in release_info_ext is non-0
before attempting to release it.
---