>
> The next libcacard that will be released will be based on qemu/libcacard,
> which
> is what's being worked on. I think it has copyright headers on each file.
>
Yes, They have
--
Liang GUO
http://bluestone.cublog.cn
___
Spice-devel mailing list
Spi
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:16:34PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> Hi, Christophe
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Christophe Fergeau
> wrote:
> > Hi Liang,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:45:33PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> >> Libcacard is licensed under GPL3, spice-gtk is licensed under LGPL2.1
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:16:34PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> Thank you for your reply, will these two licacard be merged ? it is not
> nessary
> to have two library do the same thing and have the same name.
The standalone libcacard is to be considered as deprecated, qemu git can
now install libca
Hi, Christophe
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Hi Liang,
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:45:33PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
>> Libcacard is licensed under GPL3, spice-gtk is licensed under LGPL2.1,
>> but spice-gtk may call libcacard, Should this cause any legal problem
>
Hi Liang,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:45:33PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> Libcacard is licensed under GPL3, spice-gtk is licensed under LGPL2.1,
> but spice-gtk may call libcacard, Should this cause any legal problem
> ?
Actually, there are 2 differently licensed libcacard code bases, there is
the s
Hi, List,
Libcacard is licensed under GPL3, spice-gtk is licensed under LGPL2.1,
but spice-gtk may call libcacard, Should this cause any legal problem
?
Thanks,
--
Liang GUO
http://bluestone.cublog.cn
___
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.fre
