On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> In this case that would mean adding a dependency on Makefile - does that
> make sense?
>
> +generated_demarshallers.c: $(top_srcdir)/spice.proto Makefile.am
I think so. Could you test and send a patch?
--
Marc-André Lureau
___
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:02:17AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:11:35PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > > On 03/19/2012 12:01 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > >Hi
> > > >
> > > >The generated files need to be regenerated. I guess
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:09:46PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
> wrote:
> > That's debatable IMHO - 'make clean' should remove anything that was
> > created by a preivous 'make'. While 'make distclean' should remove
> > anything created b
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> That's debatable IMHO - 'make clean' should remove anything that was
> created by a preivous 'make'. While 'make distclean' should remove
> anything created by './configure'. If you really want to cache
> generated files, then it is r
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:02:17AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:11:35PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > > On 03/19/2012 12:01 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > >Hi
> > > >
> > > >The generated files need to be regenerated. I guess
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:11:35PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > On 03/19/2012 12:01 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > >Hi
> > >
> > >The generated files need to be regenerated. I guess they should
> > >have
> > >build depedency on Makefile somehow..
> > >
> > >anyway
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:11:35PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 12:01 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >The generated files need to be regenerated. I guess they should have
> >build depedency on Makefile somehow..
> >
> >anyway, as in countless times with build issues: git clean
On 03/19/2012 12:01 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
The generated files need to be regenerated. I guess they should have
build depedency on Makefile somehow..
anyway, as in countless times with build issues: git clean -dfx should
get you out of trouble.
It's only project I work on with which
Hi
The generated files need to be regenerated. I guess they should have
build depedency on Makefile somehow..
anyway, as in countless times with build issues: git clean -dfx should
get you out of trouble.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> Yesterday's issue was fixed (with com
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:32:41AM +0100, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:10:58AM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > Yesterday's issue was fixed (with commit
> > 837b98d043d10b1d6360d8e1079f88606b37ac84 , I think), but I'm still
> > failing:
> >
> > CC generated_marshallers1.lo
> > g
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:10:58AM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> Yesterday's issue was fixed (with commit
> 837b98d043d10b1d6360d8e1079f88606b37ac84 , I think), but I'm still
> failing:
>
> CC generated_marshallers1.lo
> generated_marshallers1.c:2:25: fatal error: marshallers.h: No such
> file
Yesterday's issue was fixed (with commit
837b98d043d10b1d6360d8e1079f88606b37ac84 , I think), but I'm still failing:
CC generated_marshallers1.lo
generated_marshallers1.c:2:25: fatal error: marshallers.h: No such file
or directory
compilation terminated.
configure:
Spice-Gtk 0
12 matches
Mail list logo