Hi,
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:29:15PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:38:14AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > Another question is however "Are we going to use g_critical
> > > as g_critical?". It sounds a tricky question. Let say that
> > > a new person start
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:29:15PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:38:14AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > Another question is however "Are we going to use g_critical as
> > > g_critical?". It sounds a tricky question. Let say that a new person
> > > starts to
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:38:14AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > Another question is however "Are we going to use g_critical as
> > g_critical?". It sounds a tricky question. Let say that a new person
> > starts to look at the code and knows GLib. He see g_critical and
> > think "well, thi
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:38:14AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Another question is however "Are we going to use g_critical as
> g_critical?". It sounds a tricky question. Let say that a new person
> starts to look at the code and knows GLib. He see g_critical and
> think "well, this by default
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:21:56AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:10:23PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> > > There is a lot of debate, distributed across a large number of patches,
> > > regarding similar SPICE and glib facilities. For a number
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:21:56AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:10:23PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> > There is a lot of debate, distributed across a large number of patches,
> > regarding similar SPICE and glib facilities. For a number of things, th
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:10:23PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> There is a lot of debate, distributed across a large number of patches,
> regarding similar SPICE and glib facilities. For a number of things, there
> are two sets of parallel APIs with slightly different behaviour. This is
On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 17:10 +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> There is a lot of debate, distributed across a large number of
> patches, regarding similar SPICE and glib facilities. For a number of
> things, there are two sets of parallel APIs with slightly different
> behaviour. This is undesi
There is a lot of debate, distributed across a large number of patches,
regarding similar SPICE and glib facilities. For a number of things, there are
two sets of parallel APIs with slightly different behaviour. This is
undesirable, as it introduces confusion.
Pros: this lets us customize the b
