Hi
- Mensaje original -
> I just checked the celt page. According to this:
>
> http://www.celt-codec.org/news/
>
> Celt is compatible to the chosen version of current spice until
> version
> 0.6.1. In 0.7.0 they changed the bit stream of celt.
>
> However even 0.6.1 is not able to be bu
I just checked the celt page. According to this:
http://www.celt-codec.org/news/
Celt is compatible to the chosen version of current spice until version
0.6.1. In 0.7.0 they changed the bit stream of celt.
However even 0.6.1 is not able to be build with spice as there are the
versions used i
Hey,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 08:11:17AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Just a reminder that there is a 1y old patch for celt update (with caps
> nego), and that some distro were thinking of shipping it iirc, but I think we
> managed to convince them not too.
>
> https://gitorious.org/~elmarc
Hi
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 05:01:51PM -0700, Naga Mohan Pothula wrote:
> > I noticed celt 0.11.1 had released but still spice uses
> > celt 0.5.1.3 which is very old version.It is clearly mentioned in
> > Building instruction at wiki. celt = 0.5.1.3 (this
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 05:01:51PM -0700, Naga Mohan Pothula wrote:
> I noticed celt 0.11.1 had released but still spice uses
> celt 0.5.1.3 which is very old version.It is clearly mentioned in
> Building instruction at wiki. celt = 0.5.1.3 (this is important, newer
> versions use a differen
Hi,
I noticed celt 0.11.1 had released but still spice uses celt 0.5.1.3 which is
very old version.It is clearly mentioned in Building instruction at wiki.
celt = 0.5.1.3 (this is important, newer versions use a different protocol)
Is there any specific reason why spice still uses celt 0.5.1
