I've started a conversation on the xorg-devel mailing list[1], and I'll
follow up directly in irc with Adam and/or Keith if I don't get any answers.
Keith very kindly put together a patch to add write block handlers for us:
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-June/031783.html
It not
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:59:20AM -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
I've started a conversation on the xorg-devel mailing list[1], and I'll
follow up directly in irc with Adam and/or Keith if I don't get any answers.
Keith very kindly put together a patch to add write block handlers for us:
Okay; I unimaginatively decided that would be Hard. Wouldn't that break
the ABI, and therefore be rejected unilaterally? I'm willing to try to
craft a patch and submit it; but maybe I just need encouragement grin.
I started looking at this, talked to Dave Airlie and he suggested to ask
on
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:42:17AM -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
However, while the X server main loop has a facility that lets us add fds
to it's
select read mask, it has no such facility to let us add fds to it's
*write* select mask.
Right. This is the problem. I think the right
However, while the X server main loop has a facility that lets us add fds to
it's
select read mask, it has no such facility to let us add fds to it's *write*
select mask.
Right. This is the problem. I think the right solution is to patch the X
server.
Okay; I unimaginatively decided
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:24:29PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
I spent a fair amount of energy trying to understand the issue with EAGAIN
and the xspice server. I've sent in one patch which I believe to be
correct.
I had some further thoughts I wanted to share as well.
To reprise, the
I spent a fair amount of energy trying to understand the issue with EAGAIN
and the xspice server. I've sent in one patch which I believe to be
correct.
I had some further thoughts I wanted to share as well.
To reprise, the issue occurs when we send the large ping test packet from the
server;
