Support.
I'm not aware of any IPR on this document.
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 17:06
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Poll for adoption: draft-kumar-spring-sr-oam-requirement
Hello working group,
Thi
Hi Stéphane,
> From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 9:23 AM
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> " 1) I don't really the issue. From a forwarding standpoint, looks like
> we can simply program multiple SIDs in the FIB."
>
> [SLI] What about the IP to MPLS entry ?
[Bruno] If tra
Hi Bruno ,
Agree with you, it is necessary to define a tie-break.
And as described in the draft
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lw-spring-sid-allocation-01,
it has described the tie-breaker between two or more SRMNs by SR
Capabilities Sub-TLV extension
with the Allocation bit set, the tie-
Hi Bruno,
"1) I don't really the issue. From a forwarding standpoint, looks like
we can simply program multiple SIDs in the FIB."
[SLI] What about the IP to MPLS entry ?
