On Nov 9, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Eric C Rosen <ero...@juniper.net> wrote: > > On 11/6/2015 8:18 AM, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote: >> A prefix may have a shorter mask than 32 (or 128) and still be ok for >> the Originator SRGB to be there. > > Stefano, > > On further thought, I wonder if I misunderstood the point of your question. > If all the addresses falling under a given prefix are loopback addresses of > the same node, then the same SRGB might apply to all of them.
yes, but note that nothing mandates that we use only loopback addresses and nothing mandates a loopback address to be a /32. > In that case, it might make sense to have a shorter prefix but still > advertise the Originator-SRGB. Is that what you're thinking? yes and more widely, I don’t want to constrain the advertisement of the Originator-SRGB to a /32 (or even to a loopback interface prefix). s. > But on the other hand, if a node has multiple loopback addresses, it > probably won't want the same SID assigned to all of them. > > Eric _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
