Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

Hi Les, Happy new year. I agree with your proposal. The text must state that there must be a local configuration mechanism that avoids sender to originate overlapping SRGB. In this case, as you mention, if a router receives overlapping SRGB, this is a bad behavior and we cannot guess if the

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

Stephane - From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com [mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 12:55 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; spring@ietf.org Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY Hi Les, Happy

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

Since the ranges are all advertised by a single SR capable router and can easily be validated locally, I support this change. Thanks, Acee From: spring > on behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"

[spring] FW: review of draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06

FYI -Original Message- From: Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng) [mailto:kwier...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 2:25 PM To: i...@ietf.org; sec...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org Subject: review of draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06 Hi, I have