[spring] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please r

[spring] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06: Abstain When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer t

[spring] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refe

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

Hi Les, > From: LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/OINIS > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 9:24 > AM > > Hi Les, > > The new text proposal looks good. +1 Thanks -- Bruno > > Thanks, > > Stephane > > > -Original Message- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] > Sent: W

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

Hi Les, The new text proposal looks good. Thanks, Stephane -Original Message- From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 00:03 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/OINIS; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) Cc: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; spring@ietf.org; Um