Yes/support, very much needed guideline on conflict resolution!
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> bruno.decra...@orange.com
>> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 12:55 AM
>> To: spring@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-sp
Stefano,
Before this draft concludes in the SPRING WG, you may wish to ask the MPLS
and PALS WGs for a review, since LDP (inter)operation directly affects
them, and they have considerable experience with LDP.
Thanks,
Andy
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) <
sprev...@c
Support as co-author.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> bruno.decra...@orange.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 12:55 AM
> To: spring@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
> call
this is the latest update of the ldp-interop draft after various comments among
which the ones from Alex (sorry from being so late).
I hope it address most of the comments, knowing that the authors are still
working on the manageability section (I just didn’t want to let the draft
expire).
Tha
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking of the
IETF.
Title : Segment Routing interworking with LDP
Authors : Clarence Filsfils
I support WG adoption. The conflict resolution document is required for
standard SID conflict error handling across all protocols and vendors.
Thanks,
Acee
On 4/14/16, 3:50 AM, "spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com"
wrote:
>Dear WG,
>
>As we discussed at our meeting last week, working g
Support the WG adoption as co-author.
thanks,
Peter
On 4/14/16 09:50 , bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Dear WG,
As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
Please reply to the list with your comments, incl
as co-author, I support the WG adoption of this draft
s.
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 9:50 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Dear WG,
>
> As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
> requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
> Please reply to the
> From: bruno.decra...@orange.com > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:51 AM
>
> Dear WG,
>
> As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
> requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
> Please reply to the list with your comments, including although not l
Dear WG,
As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
Please reply to the list with your comments, including although not limited to
whether or not you support adoption.
Thanks,
--John and Bruno
__
As reviewer not aware on IPR related to this draft
On 13/04/16 20:32, "spring on behalf of EXT Martin Pilka"
wrote:
>Hello Bruno,
>I am also not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
>Thanks,
>Martin
>
>
>On 13/04/16 09:57, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>> Working Group,
>>
>> The autho
11 matches
Mail list logo
