There are many operators and use cases where, instead of encapsulation, srh
insertion is a far better option.
In fact all current implementations are doing srh insertion.
Still, from a spec perspective, the srh processis the same.
s.
-Original Message-
From: rabah.gued...@orange.com [r
You have said in a previous response to a question that the draft only consider
the encapsulation of client packet into a new IPV6 header with SRH, and not
adding only an SRH to an existing packet.
Which make sense especially for service providers who would prefer to tunnel
client traffic (not
On Apr 28, 2016, at 11:13 AM, rabah.gued...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Rabah Guedrez
> Thésard
> ORANGE/IMT/OLN/WTC/IEE/ITEQ
>
> Phone: +33 2 96 07 18 56
> rabah.gued...@orange.com
>
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) [mailto:sprev...@cisco.com]
> Envoyé : m
Rabah Guedrez
Thésard
ORANGE/IMT/OLN/WTC/IEE/ITEQ
Phone: +33 2 96 07 18 56
rabah.gued...@orange.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) [mailto:sprev...@cisco.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 27 avril 2016 15:50
À : GUEDREZ Rabah IMT/OLN
Cc : spring@ietf.org; i...@iet
