Dear Clarence Filsfils, Stefano Previdi, Ahmed Bashandy, Bruno Decraene,
Stephane Litkowski, Martin Horneffer, Edward Crabbe, Rob Shakir,
jefft...@gmail.com:
An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "Segment
Routing with MPLS data plane" (draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
> https://www.google.com/patents/US9049233
sorry, we missed that one in the disclosure. I just updated the list and a new
IPR disclosure has been issued.
s.
>
> may be applicable, as may some of the cited patents.
>
> Stewart
>
>
Hi Stefano,
Thanks for the updates, it's fine for me . I just noted that you finally kept
the name "Shortest path based protection".
If that's your preference I'm fine.
I will complete the shepherd review in the next couple of days.
Best Regards and thanks again,
Stephane
-Original Messa
Hi Stephane,
I incorporated your last comments and submitted a new version of the draft. Let
me know if it addresses your comments.
Thanks.
s.
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 12:10 PM, stephane.litkow...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano
>
> Answers inline
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> -Original Mess
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking of the
IETF.
Title : Use-cases for Resiliency in SPRING
Authors : Clarence Filsfils
Ste
Hi Stefano
Answers inline
Best Regards,
-Original Message-
From: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) [mailto:sprev...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 18:18
To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS
Cc: SPRING WG
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-05.txt
Hi Ste
Also the following IPR may be relevant (it covers stacks of MPLS labels to
forward packets, but is not related to routing protocols). I'm not a lawyer and
can't judge that.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2314/
Regards,
Ruediger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: spring [mailto:spring-b
https://www.google.com/patents/US9049233
may be applicable, as may some of the cited patents.
Stewart
On 09/09/2016 12:57, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
Authors and Contributors,
it seems that we are missing answers to the IPR question from a good
number of people:
Authors: Clarence, Ahmed, Mar
Hi Jeff,
> On Sep 22, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Thanks for the explanation, I have got a bit of different view on the use of
> algorithm logic.
> PBR is orthogonal to what an IGP does and IMO its presence should not be
> signaled.
please look at the exampl
