Hi All,
New draft submitted for "separating routing planes using segment routing".
Looking for inputs and comments.
PS: The draft erroneously got submitted as individual and not affiliated to any
WG but the intention was to submit it to SPRING WG.
We will correct it once the submission window op
This draft may be interesting to folks involved in 6man and SPRING WG as well.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: mpls [mailto:mpls-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Xuxiaohu
> 发送时间: 2017年3月14日 10:31
> 收件人: m...@ietf.org
> 主题: [mpls] 转发: New Version Notification for
> draft-xu-mpls-unified-source-ro
Thanks, Stefano.
Bruno, at your convenience can you confirm that you're satisfied with the
resolution? Looks OK to me even though the changes don't precisely adhere to
your suggestions ("Link NLRI uses the Protocol-ID value" instead of "Link NLRI
uses the BGP Protocol-ID value"). The rfcdiff is
> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stefano Previdi
> (sprevidi)
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 1:07 PM
> To: SPRING WG
> Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-04.txt
>
> new version with, hopefully, all comments, questions an
John, Bruno,
sorry for having missed that. I’ll resubmit right now. I integrated all
comments. Regarding the missing "section 3.1" (referring to the isis draft), I
replaced text with the reference to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext
which defines the bgp-ls tlv for advertising the SRGB
