[spring] 答复: 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

Nobody said that such mapping must be distributed in a routing protocol☺ We just said that such mapping is always required no matter we use an MPLS label as function instruction or using the latter part of an IPv6 address as function instruction. Best regards, Xiaohu 发件人: rras...@gmail.com

Re: [spring] 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

Hi, Can you point me to any SRv6 document mandating that such mapping MUST be done in a routing protocol ? Thx, R. On May 9, 2017 05:16, "Xuxiaohu" wrote: Hi Robert, Except the function indicated by all zeros, it does require mappings between functions, function

[spring] 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

Hi Robert, Except the function indicated by all zeros, it does require mappings between functions, function indications and locators. Take tenant network function as an example☺ Best regards, Xiaohu 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Robert Raszuk 发送时间: 2017年5月8日 20:13 收件人:

Re: [spring] Mail regarding draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution

Shraddha - We are still not on the same page. The text you mention as regards handling SRMS advertisements in the IGP drafts (e.g. Section 2.4.5.2 in https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-12.txt ) is discussing how one determines if the advertiser of the prefix is

Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-10.txt

Now, hopefully, this version addresses all comments (one was missing). s. > On May 8, 2017, at 7:40 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in

[spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-10.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking of the IETF. Title : Resiliency use cases in SPRING networks Authors : Clarence Filsfils

Re: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

Hi Stewart, > ​ Yes, but those are required anyway to support SRv6 That is incorrect. Please watch Les's presentation during last IETF where he clearly and correctly stated that IGP extensions for SRv6 are optional and not required (unlike in the case of SR-MPLS where such signalling of global

Re: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

On 05/05/2017 11:17, Robert Raszuk wrote: And to add one observation .. Stewart makes a point that SR-MPLS can be deployed without mpls control plane. Well it sure does not require LDP however IGP or BGP extensions for SR-MPLS signalling is also an example of mpls control plane ... even