Hi, Alvaro,
We just posted rev -09, addressing these.
Please note that regarding "2. [nit]”, we left the additional references. For
example, rfc7880 in itself is not sufficient, and rfc7881 defines S-BFD for
MPLS. rfc7882 specifically talks about this use case in Section 3.4 and
therefore seem
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the
IETF.
Title : A Scalable and Topology-Aware MPLS Dataplane
Monitoring System
Authors : Ruediger Geib
I'll take care of it. Thanks!
Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
Excuze typofraphicak errows
On Jul 25, 2017, at 18:42, Alvaro Retana (aretana)
mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi!
I looked -08 and almost everything looks good to me.
The only exception is the result from the comment below:
Hi!
I looked -08 and almost everything looks good to me.
The only exception is the result from the comment below:
1. All the new references should be Informative as they seem to just be
examples: “Packets from a variety of protocols can be used to check continuity.
These include…”.
2.
