Dear authors:
I just finished reviewing this document – sorry for the delay in processing.
Thanks for all the work you’ve but into this document!
I have some significant concerns (see below for details). In general, the
document presents an incomplete view of the architecture: details about
Hi Pushpasis,
Thank you very much! This is what I want. The internal use cases may reserve
the range so that it can not be used by external use cases.
Definitely, we can use any label range in the ‘next’ LFIB.
Thank you again!
Best regards,
Cheng
发件人: Pushpasis Sarkar [mailto:pushpasis.i...@
Hi Chengli,
Once again please see answer inline
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Chengli (Distance)
wrote:
> Hi Pushpasis,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your answer, now I understand the reason of it. Please read
> detailed reply inline.
>
>
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Pushpasis Sarkar [mailto:pushpasis.i...@gmail
Hi Pushpasis,
Thank you for your answer, now I understand the reason of it. Please read
detailed reply inline.
发件人: Pushpasis Sarkar [mailto:pushpasis.i...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2017年8月10日 14:29
收件人: Chengli (Distance)
抄送: draft-ietf-spring-anycast-segm...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: