Hi, Martin,
Friendly Reminder for your feedback to close this review.
Cheers,
Gaurav
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
> Hey Martin,
>
> Seeking your feedback here. Regarding Section 7.1, The intent of the
> document is to describe one suggestive way and do not attempt to
>
I second the concerns raised by Xiaohu, Francois, and Zafar.
From: mpls on behalf of "Zafar Ali (zali)"
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 7:02 PM
To: "Francois Clad (fclad)" , "徐小虎(义先)"
Cc: mpls , SPRING WG List , "s...@ietf.org"
, draft-farrel-mpls-sfc ,
mpls-chairs , mpls
Subject: Re: [mp
Dear MPLS WG Chairs and the authors of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc,
I would like to draw your attention to the serious issue raised by Xiaohu and
Francois.
Summary:
Please note that this working group adaption against the IETF process and its
spirit. Please recall the adaption call.
Details:
Just
FYI…
There is a presentation on Segment Routing in the agenda.
Alvaro.
On March 8, 2018 at 10:13:48 AM, Brian Trammell (IETF) (i...@trammell.ch)
wrote:
Greetings, all,
I've posted a draft meeting agenda for PAN(P)RG at IETF 101 at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-p
As you mentioned draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution has already expired.
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls covers local label collision only
that is totally independent of any routing protocols and is a lot simpler.
Ahmed
On 3/8/2018 9:28 AM, Rob Shakir wrote:
Hi Ahmed,
Thanks for t
Hi,
Here is a new version of the draft. This version has non-trivial changes
from the previous one. Here is a summary of the changes
- Specifications of the rules governing SRGB and SRLB
- Specification of how to translate a SID index into a label
- Specification of what a router do when recei
Francois, Xiaohu,
I fully agree with you.
s.
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Francois Clad (fclad) wrote:
>
> Hi Xiaohu, all,
>
> I agree with the point raised by Xiaohu. The draft-farrel-mpls-sfc is copying
> ideas described in draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining. Please note that the work
> i
Hi Xiaohu, all,
I agree with the point raised by Xiaohu. The draft-farrel-mpls-sfc is copying
ideas described in draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining. Please note that the work in
draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining started one year before draft-farrel-mpls-sfc.
At IETF100, three drafts in this area were
