Re: [spring] SRv6 - SRH in encaps or base header - point 2

2018-10-26 Thread Darren Dukes (ddukes)
+spring Hi Joel, you’ve described sections titled “Intra SR Domain Packet”, “Transit Packet Through SR Domain”, and "SR Source Nodes Not Directly Connected”. I’ve parsed them inline to the sections of the draft defining them and given more context where needed. On Oct 22, 2018, at 8:49 PM, Joe

Re: [spring] SRv6 revision: edge behavior minor description issue

2018-10-26 Thread Darren Dukes (ddukes)
+spring Hi Joel, Ack on forward reference in 6.2, I’ll use the text I suggested. However Prefix-H is an example for the following SR Domain ingress routers permit traffic destined to select SIDs with segment lists. local policy requiring HMAC TLV processing for those select SIDs,

Re: [spring] SRv6 - SRH in encaps or base header - point 2

2018-10-26 Thread Joel Halpern
(resending, +spring as requested) Thank you for the responses. I will respond in line, marked . I fear it will shortly get too deep, but the context is important. I will rephrase here an issue from another thread that I ahve not seen your comments on. If Node 9 is sending traffic to Node

Re: [spring] SRv6 revision: edge behavior minor description issue

2018-10-26 Thread Joel M. Halpern
While I would prefer an explicit enumeration of cases, I think your proposed text likely fixes the specific problem. Yours, Joel On 10/26/18 2:22 PM, Darren Dukes (ddukes) wrote: +spring Hi Joel, Ack on forward reference in 6.2, I’ll use the text I suggested. However Prefix-H is an example f