Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your support and the comments!
The comments will be addressed in future version.
Best regards,
Mach
From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 12:51 AM
To: SPRING WG ; bruno.decra...@orange.com
Cc: draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segm.
Hi Bruno, Authors, et al.,
I support the adoption of the document by SPRING WG.
I've made comments to the draft and will share the text addressing them
before the week's end.
Regards,
Greg
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:03 AM wrote:
> Hi SPRING WG,
>
> This email initiates a two week call for workin
Hi,
The draft defines useful functionality however doesn’t talk about implications
wrt MSD (RFC8491/8476)
PSID is an additional label in the stack, it has implications to the MSD
signaling, PCE computation, what happens when egress expects PSID but ingress
can’t impose one and similar cases.
I
Bruno,
Quick update - E/// IPR folks have responded and looking into this.
Cheers,
Jeff
On Feb 22, 2019, 3:49 PM -0800, Jeff Tantsura , wrote:
> Bruno,
>
> Please let me reach out to E/// IPR department (BCCed).
> I’ll let them comment.
>
> Thanks
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
> > 原始邮件
> > 发件人：bruno.decra
Hi Rakesh
Yes, that reference would be useful.
- Stewart
On 22/02/2019 22:37, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote:
Hi Stewart,
Thanks for your comments.
There is a companion draft where this TLV is defined. We can add reference/text
to indicate this.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-sprin
I support the adoption of this draft.
Xiaohu
--
From:bruno.decraene
Send Time:2019年2月20日(星期三) 17:03
To:SPRING WG
Cc:draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segm...@ietf.org
Subject:[spring] Working Group Adoption Call for
draft-cheng-spri
I support the adoption of this draft as WG item.
Thanks.
s.
> On Feb 20, 2019, at 10:03 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi SPRING WG,
>
> This email initiates a two week call for working group adoption for
> draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment.
>
> Please indicate your support, com
