Hi Rajesh:
Thank you for your comments.It is not 2 times failure,Because the layer-3
adjacency interface may be same as the primary interface of next sid.
Ths
Zhibo
发件人: spring [spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Rajesh M
[mrajesh=40juniper@dmarc.ietf.or
Hi Rajesh:
There are four reason Anycast address cann`t work.
1:If using anycast address,When the AC interface of egress PE is
failure,traffic will detour.
2:if using anycast address,The overlay path is limited by the underlay path,if
VPN1 wants to prefer PE1,VPN2 wants to prefer PE2.It cann
FYI...
On April 3, 2019 at 12:30:39 PM, The IESG (iesg-secret...@ietf.org) wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Inter-Domain Routing WG (idr) to
consider the following document: - 'BGP-LS extensions for Segment Routing
BGP
Egress Peer Engineering'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans
As a contributor, I'm not aware of non-disclosed IPR.
--Bruno
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 7:50 PM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] IPR Poll for draf
Please find few comments on this draft
1. Section 3.1.1 , below must be Ref2
Ref1: Hardware (microcode) just punts the packet. Software (slow path)
implements the required OAM
mechanism. Timestamp is not carried in the packet forwarded to the
next hop.
1. 4.1.2.2, here it must be N2 (pag
