Hi all,
The minutes for the two SPRING sessions at IETF 106 can be found at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/minutes-106-spring-01.txt
Please let me know if any changes may be needed. Thank you!
Regards,
Shuping
___
spring
I re-read this draft, and I am afraid it is currently under-specified.
In order for the various examples to work, there is assumed behavior by
the processor to which packets are punted. I could not find where this
normative behavior is described explicitly. It appears that the
behavior
Hello,
As agreed in the working group session in Singapore, this message starts a
new two week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing:
Title: Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in Segment
Routing Networks with IPv6 Data plane (SRv6)
Author : Z. Ali, C. Filsfils,
On 4/12/19 13:37, Ron Bonica wrote:
[...]
>
> It seems to me that the following are equally controversial:
>
>
>
> * A transit node inserting a Routing header
> * A transit node removing a Routing header
>
>
>
> We have agreed to move discussion of RH insertion out of the Network
>
Pablo,
It seems to me that the following are equally controversial:
* A transit node inserting a Routing header
* A transit node removing a Routing header
We have agreed to move discussion of RH insertion out of the Network
Programming draft and into another draft. Shouldn't