Loa,
Many thanks.
The comments in your email has been addressed in latest version in the GitHub.
We are working to address the rest of your comments.
Thanks
Regards … Zafar
From: Loa Andersson
Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 at 5:03 AM
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" , Brian E Carpenter
, Ole Troan
Robert,
Again, we agree on something. That is, that both of us have better things to do
than to continue this discussion.
So, let us agree that the only advantages of SRv6 over SR-MPLS are those
documented in RFC 8354. That is, that SRv6 can be deployed in some places where
SR-MPLS cannot.
Ron,
The question you asked is like request to provide advantages of traveling
by plane vs by car.
To me SRv6 is completely different solution then SR-MPLS in all aspects of
it. I listed few examples but you had different opinion. And I really have
no time now to argue with you about advantages o
Robert,
Is the question really that difficult to answer?
If not, the effort required to answer it would be much less than the effort
required to avoid answering it!
Ron
From: spring On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Thu
Hi Ron,
I am really not sure where are you going with this bumerang request.
Do you think that customers or users of the technology are so incapable
that IETF must provide them list of advantages of one protocol choice vs
alternatives ?
Is this really an IETF job to provide advantages of say ISI
Pablo,
So where should the advantages of SRv6 over SR-MPLS be documented?
Maybe someone in the WG will offer to start a new document?
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 7:15 AM
To: Ron Bonica ; bru
Ron,
Comparison between SRv6 and SR-MPLS is outside the scope of this document. IMHO
it would be a misguided attempt to try capturing this in a mere bullet list.
This WGLC is for a Standards Track document that focuses on technical aspects
requiring standardization for interoperable implementat
