Re: [spring] Who is the design ultimate authority over IPv6? (Re: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming)

Sorry realized I had hit direct reply so adding relevant Andrew Get Outlook for iOS From: Andrew Alston Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2020 09:07 To: Brian E Carpenter Subject: Re: Who is the design ultimate authority over IPv6? (Re: [spring] WGLC

[spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12

In sections 4.13, (implicitly in 4.14) and 4.15 a set of steps is indicated. As far as I can tell the processing of the IPv6 header chain in all cases is terminated. e.g., " When N receives a packet whose IPv6 DA is S and S is a local End.BM SID, does: S01. When an SRH is processed {

Re: [spring] Suggest some text //RE: Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

> But, again, I expect not everyone agrees on this idea. You probably > won't; then I'll respect that. Sometimes we just have to agree to > disagree. Well perhaps to your surprise I am all for clarity in the specifications. So I have nothing against this spec (or any other spec) to formally upda