Support
Ahmed
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020, 7:46 AM wrote:
> Hi SPRING WG,
>
> Authors of draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment [1] have asked for WG
> adoption.
>
> Please indicate your support, comments, or objection, for adopting this
> draft as a working group item by July 6th 2020.
>
> Could t
As co-author I support the adoption, and commit to continuing the work to
progress it.
Thanks.
Jeffrey
Juniper Business Use Only
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 7:46 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG adoption
Support.
Thanks,
Mike.
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 10:46 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG adoption call for draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment
Hi SPRING WG,
Authors of draft-voyer-spring-sr-replica
Robert
Understood.
This is for brown field existing LDPv6 core.
The thought was migration from LDPv6 fo SRV6.
So with LDPv6 it’s simple to go to SR-MPLS v6 as you are reusing the MPLS
data plane. So I was thinking of using that a simple stepping stone to get
to SRv6 end state. We would stay
Dear chairs and the WG,
The document is in a mature state; I support the WG LC.
Thanks
Regards … Zafar
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:01 PM
To: "spring@ietf.org"
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/d
Dear Chairs and the WG,
I support adoption of this draft.
I am one of the contributors and am committed to working with the WG to
complete the work.
Thanks
Regards … Zafar
From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com"
Date: Monday, June 22, 2020 at 10:48 AM
To: "spring@ietf.org"
Su
Hi,
1. The YANG model would benefit having references for various leaf-nodes
2. Need validated examples, config and operational, in the document
Regards,
Reshad.
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:01 PM
To: "spring@ietf.org"
Cc: "spring-cha...@i
