This is an important draft to define the SR Policy Yang definition. Support the
WG adoption.
Thanks,
Kausik
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 8:38 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-po
Hi All,
I support the adoption of this document by the WG. The Yang model for SRv6 is
something that the WG needs to work on as a deliverable alongside all the
ongoing SRv6 work. The proposal in the draft aligns with the
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming and thus provides a good base f
Hi All,
I support the WG adoption of this important Yang model for SR Policy. It is one
of the WG milestones and therefore something that the WG has already resolved
to work upon. The proposal in the draft itself is well advanced and provides a
very good version for the WG to accomplish this wo
Dear WG:
This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang/ ending Monday
27th July 2020.
Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this document into the WG..
Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack ther
Hello authors. I have some observations/questions:
1. Dynamic Candidate path has constraints but no optimization-metric that I
can see: i.e find shortest path by TE METRIC, Latency etc. Any plans to add?
1. Bandwidth demand appear to be missing. For example, requested would be
useful for
Dear WG:
This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang/ ending
Monday 27th July 2020.
Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this document into the WG..
Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack
