Re: [spring] [Lsr] draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type

Hi Thomas, I've clarified a few points inline. Thank you, -- Sergey From: thomas.g...@swisscom.com Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 12:55 AM To: Fomin, Sergey (Nokia - US/Mountain View) ; ketant=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org Cc: l...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [spring]

Re: [spring] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-17

Hi Brian, Many thanks for the time you took to do a thorough review, please see inline below with [PC]. Cheers, Pablo. -Original Message- From: Brian Weis via Datatracker Sent: jueves, 27 de agosto de 2020 5:14 To: sec...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@iet

Re: [spring] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-04

May be I was not very clear. My only ask is we must Recommended "BGP next hop and SRV6 service SID for a BGP route must be derived from the same locator" So that we no need to check the reachability to BGP nexthop and then check the reachability to SRV6 service SID >From the draft section >"5

[spring] PSP and USP uN Flavors

2nd try, Folks, In draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid, a uN represents an instruction (END, END.T) instantiated on a node. Can that instruction have a PSP or USP flavor? If so, wouldn't the PSP/USP cause an SRH that has not yet been processed to be deleted? -Karthik Juniper

[spring] PSP and USP uN Flavors

Folks, In draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid, a uN represents an instruction (END, END.T) instantiated on a node. Can that instruction have a PSP or USP flavor? If so, wouldn't the PSP/USP cause an SRH that has not yet been processed to be deleted? - Karthik Non-Juniper _

Re: [spring] [Lsr] draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type

Hi Sergey, Thanks for the feedback. I am fully in line with your comment. * Maybe we should consider adding a generic type 'Segment Routing' w/o extra details if this might become an implementation challenge? I would be interested to understand what extra details you would include in this

Re: [spring] [Lsr] draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type

Hi Ketan, Thanks a lot for the feedback. So far Sergey feedbacked in favor to keep IE46 and SrSidType being separate. Lets see which opinion others have on the list. * Also, from an operational perspective (looking holistically), we have LSP ping/trace tools specified for MPLS (including S