hi，WG，
I support the adoption.
I have interesting in deploying the path segment to get end-to-end path
protection.
BR.
HUANAN CHEN（陈华南）
Data Communication Research Department
Research Institute of China Telecom Co.,Ltd.
From: James Guichard
Date: 2020-11-04 01:39
To: spring@ietf.org
Hi,
Support as co-author.
Best regards,
Mach
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 1:39 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment
Dear WG:
This
Hi Ketan,
Thanks for this update / referencing the yang related question I had about
multiple objective/constraints (1). Regarding composite candidate path, quickly
thinking about it from a controller/pce point of view, it does seem like an
elegant solution to re-use the entire SR Policy constr
Hi,
I support the adoption of draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment as it describes a
useful feature (identifying an SR path through a segment identifier) which is
already available in implementations.
Thanks.
s.
> On Nov 3, 2020, at 6:39 PM, James Guichard
> wrote:
>
> Dear WG:
>
> This mes
