Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your inputs and feedback. Please check inline below.
From: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Sent: 12 November 2020 04:46
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-09
Hi Jingrong,
Many thanks for your review comments. We will address them in the next updates
of the document.
Thanks,
Rakesh
From: spring
Date: Monday, November 2, 2020 at 2:04 AM
To: James Guichard , spring@ietf.org
Cc: ippm-cha...@ietf.org , spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG
I support WG adoption.
Thanks
Gyan
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 9:46 AM Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
> Support!
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Regards … Zafar
>
>
>
> *From: *spring on behalf of James Guichard <
> james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 8:52 AM
> *To: *"spring@i
I support WG adoption.
Thanks
Gyan
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 11:39 AM Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
> Support!
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Regards … Zafar
>
>
>
> *From: *spring on behalf of James Guichard <
> james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, November 3, 2020 at 12:41 PM
> *To: *"spring@i
Hi Ketan, Pavan,
Good discussion. Just going to chip in some thoughts…
One of the elements I personally like of the SR Policy model is that many
Candidate Paths may exist, but only one may be active and a candidate path
contains 1 or many SID lists. It’s a simple parent/child - root/leaf tree w
Hi Chairs,
I support adoption of this draft. It describes a useful feature for
SRv6 path identification. I am a co-author of this draft.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 11:09 PM James Guichard
wrote:
>
> Dear WG:
>
>
>
> This message starts a 3 week WG adoption call for
> https://tools.ie
