Re: [spring] [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

Hi Giuseppe, Thanks for your response. Perhaps my point was not clear and so let me please clarify. I am seeing the IFIT signalling related drafts for BGP and PCEP (it was also there in LSR?) in their individual protocol working groups. While what these protocols are doing is only "carrying" (

Re: [spring] [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

Hi Ketan, Thanks a lot for your revision. My answers inline tagged as [GF] Regards, Giuseppe From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) [mailto:ket...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 12:12 PM To: Giuseppe Fioccola ; Susan Hares ; i...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Idr] IPR Call and

Re: [spring] [ippm] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03

Hi Rakesh, thank you for the response to my comments. Please find my follow-up notes in-lined below under the GIM>> tag. Regards, Greg On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 8:01 AM Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote: > Thank you Greg for taking time for thoroughly reviewing the documents and > providing the comme

Re: [spring] [ippm] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11

Hi Rakesh, thank you for the response to my comments. Please find my follow-up notes in-lined below under the GIM>> tag. Regards, Greg On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:33 AM Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote: > Thank you Greg for taking time for thoroughly reviewing the documents and > providing the comme

[spring] Meeting presentation material

As far as I can tell, as of now only one presenter has posted their slides. Possibly the WG secretary has some more from folks to post. Also, I realize that many people have time zone issues. But so do your chairs :-) Please post your slides. If we get to the session and you have not posted

[spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-01.txt

Hi Group, SR compression design team have submitted a new version of compression requirement draft. Main changes as follows: - added 3 items about scalibility with agreement within the design team - added an appendix including 3 items without without unanimous consensus within the design te

Re: [spring] [Bier] PCE Controller & SDN Controller & Netconf/Yang NMS Controller - lines blurred and can the names be used ubiquitously meaning the same

Hi Gyan, Sorry, I missed this (got caught on a filter cos it was a bit spammed to a lot of lists :-). > I have noticed that after reviewing many drafts across many WGs it seems in > the > industry that the lines seem to be blurred between a PCE controller, ODL or > Openflow SDN Controll