Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread chenhu...@chinatelecom.cn
I support the adoption of this document. The capability of providing different services with customized virtual networks and resources is important for a multi-service network operator. HUANAN CHEN(陈华南) Data Communication Research Department Research Institute of China Telecom Co.,Ltd. From:

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Colby, you are, as far as I can tell, correct that the potential for state explosion is extremely risky and requires careful management. That is why the bestbar draft emphasis that the state is abotu slice aggregates, not end-to-end slices, and probably not even individual IETF network slices.

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread Colby Barth
Tarek, indeed … draft-bestbar-spring-scalable-ns-00 provides a relevant example of the rather enormous amount of state the solution described in draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn results in: "Notably, this approach requires maintaining per slice state for each topological element on e

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread Tarek Saad
Hi Eduard, Inline.. On 2/2/21, 10:50 AM, "spring on behalf of Vasilenko Eduard" mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of vasilenko.edu...@huawei.com> wrote: Hi all, There is the general trend to encode the action into the packet, not to distribute state

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread stefano previdi
Hi, I support the WG adoption of this draft. Thanks. s. > On Jan 27, 2021, at 12:46 PM, James Guichard > wrote: > > Dear WG: > > This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/ > ending February 10th2021. > >

[spring] Fwd: Protocol Action: 'YANG Data Model for Segment Routing' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-30.txt)

2021-02-02 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Congratulations to the working group and the authors for another document completed through IESG approval. Yours, Joel Forwarded Message Subject: [spring] Protocol Action: 'YANG Data Model for Segment Routing' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-30.txt) Date: Tu

[spring] Protocol Action: 'YANG Data Model for Segment Routing' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-30.txt)

2021-02-02 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'YANG Data Model for Segment Routing' (draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang-30.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Source Packet Routing in Networking Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Deborah Brungard and M

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread Vasilenko Eduard
Hi all, There is the general trend to encode the action into the packet, not to distribute states in the control plane for all possible traffic types. Granularity, programmability are better. This type of virtualization is fully in-line with this trend. Support. Eduard From: spring [mailto:spring

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread Tarek Saad
Thanks. We are mostly in agreement. Regards, Tarek On 2/2/21, 4:36 AM, "spring on behalf of Robert Raszuk" mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of rob...@raszuk.net> wrote: Hi Terek, Sure that MPLS supports diff-serve from day one. No one ever stated that it d

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread Giuseppe Fioccola
Hi All, I have read it and support WG adoption for this draft that provides a mechanism based on resource-aware SIDs in order to build SR based VTNs for Enhanced VPN. Regards, Giuseppe From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 12

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi Terek, Sure that MPLS supports diff-serve from day one. No one ever stated that it does not. In fact if you go back to one of the messages I explicitly stated this already and even encourage its use to the problem at hand. But the label inferred class of service or such carried in EXP bits is

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Xuesong, Thanks for your support and comment. As this document mainly describes the SR data plane mechanisms and the procedures of building SR based VTNs, the descriptions about the control plane are brief, and the details are left to the control plane drafts. That said, we could add some m

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-02-02 Thread Lizhenbin
Hi WG, I support the adoption as the contributor. It has been three years since the first version of the draft was proposed. After long-term work, the solution is mature and well-accepted. The draft is well written and ready for adoption. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: spring [mailto:sp