Hi WG, Authors,
Support publication. The document reads well and describes key concepts
clearly. Just some friendly suggestions for the authors to consider -
- IMHO introduction section should be expanded as it can provide helpful
clues to new-bees, our published document is not just for the insi
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your review and comments.
We can update that text to clarify as below:
When BGP SR Policy is the Protocol-Origin, the BGP process receiving the route
provides the distinguisher (refer to Section 2.1 of
[I-D.ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy]) as the discriminator.
I’ll
Hello Chairs, WG and Authors
I think there may need to be a wording adjustment required to the BGP related
text in section 2.5, for more clarity regarding the use of BGP distinguisher in
place of discriminator:
When BGP SR Policy is the Protocol-Origin, it is the distinguisher
(refer to
Hi,
This is an important draft. I support the WGLC of this draft.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Shuping
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 2:57 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-
Hi WG,
I have read the latest version of the draft and I believe it is ready for
publication.
Thanks,
Rakesh
*From: *spring on behalf of James Guichard <
> james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, April 15, 2021 at 2:57 PM
> *To: *"spring@ietf.org"
> *Cc: *"spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Hi Fan,
Please see zzh3> below.
From: Yangfan (IP Standard)
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 6:42 AM
To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; Rishabh Parekh
Cc: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) ; Rishabh Parekh
(riparekh) ; Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka)
; spring@ietf.org
Subject: 答复: [spring] 答复: Comments on d
