Hi Fan,
Thank you for the clarifications. Now I see the intended behavior better.
It was never a question that SR is a valuable tool to provide explicit routes
for DetNet. Of course,
that part is fully in-line with DetNet RFCs, which place those functionalities
at the DetNet
forwarding sub-laye
Hi Bruno,
Latest version covers most of your comments I think. Please see inline.
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 12:19 PM
To: James Guichard ; spring@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-nsh...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: WG Last Call draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr
Hi Jim,
Thanks fo
Hello,
I've reviewed this document and thanks for the updates over the past few months
since the last WG adoption. The changes made to align with the STAMP work in
IPPM WG and the companion IPPM document look good to me. The document overall
has improved as well.
The requirement for performanc
