Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt

2021-06-23 Thread Gyan Mishra
Thanks Rakesh! I support WG adoption. Kind Regards Gyan On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 5:19 PM Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote: > Thanks Gyan for your review comments. > > We will address the comments highlighted in blue in the next revision of > the document as per reply to Greg’s email. > > > > Than

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt

2021-06-23 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Greg, In loopback mode, either it is STAMP (as in this draft) or BFD (as in draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo), the reflector simply loops the test packet back in forwarding and does not participate in test. In both cases, I hope you agree that the loopback mode is useful as it removes the de

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt

2021-06-23 Thread gregory.mirsky
Hi Rakesh, I'm top-posting to share my understanding of why draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo is on the Standards track. As you've noted, draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo describes the use of BFD Echo between a BFD system and a system that might not support BFD. But RFC 5880 excludes such use ca

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt

2021-06-23 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Greg, Many thanks for your review comments. Please see replies inline with … From: gregory.mir...@ztetx.com Date: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 at 4:57 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) Cc: spring@ietf.org , spring-cha...@ietf.org , jguic...@futurewei.com Subject: Re:[spring] WG Adoption Call for

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt

2021-06-23 Thread Voyer, Daniel
Support for WG adoption. Thanks dan From: James Guichard Date: Monday, June 7, 2021 at 8:34 AM To: "spring@ietf.org" Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt Dear WG: The IPPM WG has adopted ht

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt

2021-06-23 Thread gregory.mirsky
Hi Rakesh, thank you for your consideration. Please find my follow-up notes in-lined under the GIM2>> tag. Regards, Greg Mirsky Sr. Standardization Expert 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division E: gregory.mir...@ztetx.co

[spring] 答复: SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protection

2021-06-23 Thread Yangfan (IP Standard)
Hi Bala‘zs, Not only does SR facilitate explicit routes, several WG drafts also give examples on the service function providing to other areas. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-sr-service-programming https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-seg