Hi Everyone,
It is better for the WG to standardize one data plane behavior
for compressing SRv6 information at present time.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: spring on behalf of Joel M. Halpern
Date: Wednesday, 4 August 2021 at 19:52
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Progressing Standar
Dear chairs,
I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution.
I fully agree with Dhruv that the cost of multiple data plane for SRv6
compression would be unaffordable and the interoperable deployment would suffer
from it.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> Fr
Dear All,
I strongly support the standardization of a single data plane solution that
supports Segment Routing using also compressed SIDs in an IPv6 network.
Regards,
Greg Mirsky
Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
Instit
Joel
Yes, I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution.
This will enable to the WG and industry to move forward and enable vendors to
implement a single interoperable solution. It reduces overall solution
complexity and greatly benefits deployments.
Based on the experience
Dears
we want to have less solutions for sure, we do not want to introduce more
complexities in our network, so please choose one solution.
Apparently, we should standardize CSID.
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 10:28 PM
To: J
Hi Chairs, WG,
Mostly I have been in favor of providing multiple tools for the operator's
toolbox in the control plane. But in this instance, the cost of multiple
data plane behaviors for compressing SRv6 would be very high and finally,
the interoperability would suffer. In the long run, it would
