Hi WG，
After a long-term discussion in the WG, we have reached this point today
I support the adoption of CSID draft, which describes an efficient solution of
SRv6 compression.
I understand the document defines several Flavors, and I think it is just like
the normal flavors defined in RFC8986,
Hi Brian,
I've got some questions about what you've said:
For that reason, the fact that the bottom 64 bits in the
"address" look funny or change is simply irrelevant. They are
invisible to routing (which is done based on the prefix)
and invisible to neighbor discovery (because it never happens).
Greg,
I would much prefer that one of the SRv6 experts answers that question.
Regards
Brian
On 21-Oct-21 09:13, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> I've got some questions about what you've said:
>
> For that reason, the fact that the bottom 64 bits in the
>
> "address" look funny or c
