Hi Stefano,
Stefano Salsano wrote on 23/10/2021 01:29:
if an operator wants to combine CSIDs of different length, building the
debug tools becomes more complex, but this actually depends on the
specific choices and configurations
Exactly. For example, problems will occur when the operator cha
Darren & Authors
The CSID proposed clarifications looks excellent.
In the current draft revision it was clear that both Next and Replace use
the IPv6 IID portion of the address as the container to index the C-SID
using Argument portion SRv6 SID, Next having 16 bit NF and 64 bit
argument, and R
Hi Chengli
Please see my reply to Darren about the pseudocode update to the draft.
I highly recommend updating the draft per Darren’s updates, as this change
will really helps us understand the next and replace pseudocode processing
as most of the questions all related to indexing of the bits wi
Hi,
> On this basis, I'm objecting to the adoption of
> draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression as a WG draft, and
> respectfully suggest that the spring wg does not adopt any draft in future
> which allows for different C-SID lengths but doesn't encode C-SIDs as
> {length,value} tuple