Hi SPRING,
As a reminder, we will have an MSR6(Multicast Segment Routing over IPv6) side
meeting on Friday. Please find the .ics file in the attachment and the webex
link is :
https://htf-paris.my.webex.com/wbxmjs/joinservice/sites/htf-paris.my-en/meeting/download/e1f15a5546aa4426bbee2b1
It appears that it overlaps the Routing Area Open Meeting… Am I missing
something?
From: spring on behalf of Yisong Liu
Date: Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 7:02 AM
To: spring
Cc: chengweiqiang , "Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)"
, Michael McBride ,
Robin Li
Subject: [spring] Re： MSR6 side meet
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:48 PM Tianran Zhou wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Please see my reply below.
>
> Best,
> Tianran
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@herbertland.com]
> 发送时间: 2021年11月11日 2:32
> 收件人: Tianran Zhou
> 抄送: Joel M. Halpern ;
> draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-m...@ietf.org; s
Tom,
[...]
> I think you're dancing around the core problem. Hardware
> implementations didn't support Hop-by-Hop options because they contain
> TLVs which are considered to be hard to process in a high performance
> datapath hardware pipeline. RFC2460 did mandate that all intermediate
> nodes ne
Comments inline marked with HS>>
Best,
Haoyu
-Original Message-
From: ipv6 On Behalf Of Tom Herbert
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 9:05 AM
To: Tianran Zhou
Cc: draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-m...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] A question for draft-fz-spring-
+1 .
To Ole that without a good use case in a limited domain it’s hard to expect
implementation.
To the point that the HbH must remain simple to operate and very short, same
spirit as already demonstrated with SRH.
We’re in a weird situation with arbitrary limits in vendor silicon because the
Pascal,
Comments in line.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:58 AM Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
wrote:
>
> +1 .
>
> To Ole that without a good use case in a limited domain it’s hard to expect
> implementation.
>
Unfortunately, TLVs weren't interesting enough when the protocol was
defined so now we have a
Hi Tom,
Yes, to all.
My sentence was the conscious part of my +1 above in support of your work.
The values, whatever they are, must be adapted to dev cycles (over multiple
years) and could be defined with a roadmap to increase over time.
Regards,
Pascal
> Le 11 nov. 2021 à 20:19, Tom Herbe
Hi Acee,
Thanks for your interest.
The time for Side Meeting will be 13:00-14:30 for UTC, which will finish before
the Routing Area Open Meeting.
Best Regards
Yisong
发件人: Acee Lindem (acee)
时间: 2021/11/11(星期四)23:43
收件人: Yisong Liu;spring;
抄送人: chengweiqiang;Gengxuesong (Geng
> On Nov 11, 2021, at 7:43 AM, Acee Lindem (acee)
> wrote:
>
> It appears that it overlaps the Routing Area Open Meeting… Am I missing
> something?
It also overlaps with the joint 6MAN/V6OPS session.
Bob
>
> From: spring on behalf of Yisong Liu
>
> Date: Thursday, November 11, 2021 at
Hi Bob
I will be presenting at the MSR6 session and I am presenting as well at
v6OPS the hbh draft.
draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh
I am the first to present at v6OPS tomorrow after the chairs.
MSR6 side meeting starts at 8am and I am second to present so I think I
should be good to go even with the over
11 matches
Mail list logo
