Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Support WG adoption. Linda Dunbar From: spring mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 5:19 AM To: SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: [spring] WG adop

Re: [spring] IPR poll - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi Everyone, I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft. Best Regards, Huaimo From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 5:17 AM To: SPRING WG ; draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forward...@ietf.org Subject: IPR po

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi Everyone, Happy New Year! I support its adoption. It provides protections for a node SID, adjacency SID and binding SID of SR-MPLS TE path after the IGP converges. Best Regards, Huaimo as co-author From: spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com

[spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Dear WG, This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending 27/01/2022, for draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding/ After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption of the

[spring] IPR poll - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi authors, contributors, WG In preparation of the WG adoption call on draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding [1], this email starts a poll for IPR. If you are an author or contributor to the subject document, please respond to this email. * In your response, please indicate if