Hi Ahmed and the Authors,
thank you for sharing this information. I've read the draft and have
several questions and comments:
- It is not clear if you propose a new active measurement protocol or
view it as a hybrid method (based on RFC 7799 classification). On one hand,
packets are
In discussion with chairs of other routing working groups, it was noted
that there is sometimes confusion or misunderstanding about what is
sought when the chairs conduct adoption calls and WG last calls.
The top line is that we are looking for working group support and review.
In the case of
Dear WG Chairs,
The authors would like to request a WG adoption for this draft, the draft was
presented at last IETF.
We could present the draft at this IETF too, if you folks like.
Thanks,
Sami
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
Jingrong,
Limited Domain (in my view) refers to a domain where all points are under
single administrative control. I.E the source, destination and anything in the
middle must fall under the same administrative control, otherwise, you are not
within the limited domain. This can be extended
Hi There,
Speaking entirely as a working group participant,
I have two substantial concerns with this document at first skim read.
Firstly - the 12 bits for an interface ID - I have serious concerns that this
will be far from sufficient. Keep in mind you have interface specific VLAN's
(that
Hi,
I think I now understand better the concern about "the use of SIDs over the
public Internet".
In my previous mail, the SID2/SID3 used between CPE2-Internet-CPE3 is to
explain the layering model (over vs across), but it is not the proposal of the
draft.
The draft is talking about the
