Re: [spring] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-03-22 Thread Ketan Talaulikar
Thanks John for your inputs and suggestions. Thanks, Ketan On Tue, 22 Mar, 2022, 11:51 pm John Scudder, wrote: > Looks good, thanks. I’ve cleared my discuss, thanks for your work on this. > > —John > > On Mar 22, 2022, at 2:11 PM, Ketan Talaulikar > wrote: > > > > Hi John, > > Thanks for

Re: [spring] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-03-22 Thread John Scudder
Looks good, thanks. I’ve cleared my discuss, thanks for your work on this. —John On Mar 22, 2022, at 2:11 PM, Ketan Talaulikar mailto:ketant.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi John, Thanks for your guidance with the text. Very much appreciated - especially in the middle of the busy IETF week.

Re: [spring] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-03-22 Thread Ketan Talaulikar
Hi John, Thanks for your guidance with the text. Very much appreciated - especially in the middle of the busy IETF week. I've just posted an update to the draft with slight modifications to your text (so as to cover both sec 2.1 and 2.6 and suggest the use of the well-defined identifiers as a

[spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-22.txt

2022-03-22 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the IETF. Title : Segment Routing Policy Architecture Authors : Clarence Filsfils

Re: [spring] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-03-22 Thread John Scudder
Hi Ketan, Thanks as always for your quick reply. > On Mar 22, 2022, at 4:54 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote: > > > Hi John, > > I dug into my emails and you are right that while we had a discussion on > point 4 (i.e. security considerations associated with the use of symbolic > names), it was

Re: [spring] [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-filsfils-spring-path-tracing-00.txt

2022-03-22 Thread Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels)
Hi Greg, Thanks for the review and comments. Please find Inline [AA] From: Greg Mirsky Date: Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 02:25 To: Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels) , draft-filsfils-spring-path-trac...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org , spring-cha...@ietf.org , i...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [ippm] FW:

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-filsfils-spring-path-tracing-00.txt

2022-03-22 Thread Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels)
Hi Andrew, Thanks for the review and comments. Please find Inline [AA] From: ippm on behalf of Andrew Alston - IETF Date: Monday, 14 March 2022 at 16:08 To: Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels) , spring@ietf.org , spring-cha...@ietf.org , i...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [ippm] New Version Notification

Re: [spring] [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-filsfils-spring-path-tracing-00.txt

2022-03-22 Thread Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels)
Hi Tal. Thanks for the review and comments. Please find Inline [AA] From: Tal Mizrahi Date: Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 11:28 To: Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels) , spring@ietf.org , i...@ietf.org , draft-filsfils-spring-path-trac...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for

Re: [spring] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-03-22 Thread Ketan Talaulikar
Hi John, I dug into my emails and you are right that while we had a discussion on point 4 (i.e. security considerations associated with the use of symbolic names), it was not concluded. My apologies for the same. It might be helpful to place a context on why the draft uses symbolic names in the