[spring] Regarding Circuit Style Segment Routing Policies [draft-schmutzer-pce-cs-sr-policy]

Authors, This draft is introducing a specific type of transport profile for SR policy paths. To be more precise, it is introducing "Bandwidth Constrained Bidirectional Corouted Pinned Path SR policies" with restoration and/or reversion features enabled. I'm not sure if "Circuit-Styled" is an apt

Re: [spring] WG adoption for draft-boutros-spring-elan-services-over-sr-00

Hi Bruno, The main salient points in this draft are about: * Defining a service SRGB for services. * Getting rid of overlay convergence and using underlay anycast SID convergence to converge all services riding on this anycast SID. * Use of an underlay node/anycast SID to learn mac

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-02.txt

Dear OPSAWG and SPRING working group, Thanks for the feedback on slide 7. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/slides-113-opsawg-export-of-segment-routing-ipv6-information-in-ipfix-01 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-03 We understood it does

Re: [spring] Discuss on draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00

Hi, Thank you for keeping the BFD WG in the loop. I don't have any comments on the correlation, will leave that to SPRING. My only question for now is regarding the use of S-BFD echo packets. RFC7880 recommends to also use S-BFD control packets when using S-BFD echo because a transit node