Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your reply.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: thomas.g...@swisscom.com [mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:32 AM
To: Tianran Zhou ;
benoit.claise=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org
Cc
Hi Tianran,
Thanks a lot for the review and comments.
Regarding your question why it is a standards and not a informational document.
We consulted with the IPFIX IE doctors and went for a standards document
because we create a new IPFIX registry: "IPFIX IPv6 SRH Flags" subregistry. We
will fo
Hi Sasha,
Many thanks for reviewing draft-schmutzer-pce-cs-sr-policy
(draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy) and sharing your input / concerns. Let me
try to address them.
CS-SR policies don’t require additional unprotected adj-SIDs. The unprotected
adj-SID part of the two adj-SIDs you mentioned
Hi Benoit,
Thanks for bringing this up.
I have been monitoring the discussions on this draft in SPRING and OPSAWG.
As I suggested, please copy your discussions to OPSAWG also, so that we know
the progress.
Basically, this draft is simple and straight forward. It's quite similar to
rfc9160 also
