Hi Ketan，
Sorry for the late reply. Please see inline...
Best Regards,
Ran
Original
From: KetanTalaulikar
To: 陈然00080434;
Cc: alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com
;spring@ietf.org ;
Date: 2022年11月09日 21:57
Subject: Re: [spring] Hope to draw the attention of the Working
Group：draft-
Hi R,
Thanks for your comments.
1. The solution in this draft is compliant with the SR architecture and design
principles. The SR path selection is still in the ingress node. The End.NRP SID
can be used to build SR path at the ingress node similar to the End.X SID.
2. The End.X cannot prov
Hi Jie,
First a couple of question for my education.
I have looked up ITU-T G.8310 and it states that MTH is an ITU-T term for what
earlier has been known as Flex-Ethernet. Is this understanding correct? And if
yes, does the MTN path to which you refer an equivalent to a Flex-Ethernet
channel?
Hi Sasha,
Here are some thoughts about why the MTN or optical underlay connection may not
be seen as L3 links.
MTN or Optical underlay path is usually unidirectional from the ingress IP node
to the egress IP node, although provisioning and associating them into
bidirectional paths is possible.
