Hi Bruno,
Thank you for your comment.
Please find my reply inline tagged as [GF].
Regards,
Giuseppe
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 4:58 PM
To: Giuseppe Fioccola
Cc: SPRING WG List ; 6man ; Greg Mirsky
; Joel Halpern
Subject: RE: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for S
The SPRING WG Chairs have noticed several recent discussions which wound
around to the question of whether specific information belongs in a
Destination Option Header (DOH) before the SHR, or belongs in an SRH
TLV. Clearly there are some pieces of information that are closely tied
to the SRH,
Hi Joel,
> Clearly there are some pieces of information that are closely tied to the
SRH
IMHO anything that requires some action on the segment endpoints (for
example segment by segment performance measurement) is "closely tied to the
SRH".
Since processing of TLVs is subject to local configurat
Dear WG,
A year ago, we initiated a call for adoption on
draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding [proxy-forwarding].
The summary of the technical points of the discussion has been summarized on
the list [1], in particular on the two following aspects:
a) the protection/FRR part (from f
