Re: [spring] Issue 1 regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

2023-08-06 Thread Qiuyuanxiang
Hi Joel, I agree with the editors’ resolution for issue 1. "All SIDs of the SRv6 dataplane can co-exist in the same SRH. This make SRv6 a single, consistent dataplane solution". It is indeed so. I think we can close it. Best regards, Yuanxiang From: spring On Behalf Of Joel Halpern Sent:

Re: [spring] Comments on draft-ietf-spring-bfd-07

2023-08-06 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Ketan, thank you for your comments and discussion that improved the document. Dear All, the authors appreciate all the comments received and believe that the draft is ready for the WG LC. Greatly appreciate the WG Chairs' consideration of staring LC at the appropriate time. Regards, Greg On T

Re: [spring] [IPv6] Question regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

2023-08-06 Thread Chongfeng Xie
Hi, I agree with the resolution proposed by the authors. I think the issues can be closed ASAP. The current progress of this draft is a little slow, I suggest the subsequent progress can be appropriately accelerated. Many thanks to Chairs and authors. Chongfeng --- From: sp