Hello Joel and WG,
SRv6 Security model (Sec 5 of RFC8754) sufficiently covers the security
aspects of packets without SRH and the case of C-SID
(draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression),
so I believe this can be closed.
Likewise, other issues (#1, #2, #3 and #5) can be closed with the responses
fr
hi，all
I think it is OK that two SID compression flavors share the same data plane, I
agree with the author and consider this issue to be as closed.
Thanks.
BR
Roy Jiang (若弈)
Alibaba Infrastructure Services
--原始邮件 --
发件人:spring
发送时间:Tue Aug 1 05:08:34 2023
收件人:
Dear chair,
I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to express my support for the
statement made by the editor regarding the coexistence of different flavor SIDs
within the same SRH data plane. Based on my experience with multiple client
interoperability tests, this approach has been proven
Hi Joel and WG,
The issue #2 has already been addressed in draft-ietf-6man-sids.
Therefore, I agree that it can be closed here.
Thanks,
Changwang
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 9:31 AM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [s
