Joel Halpern has requested publication of
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-17 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the
SPRING working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
__
Hi Hooman,
Based upon your provided section, i took liberty to rewrite the textblob while
doing my best to keep original descriptive normative intent. (modified the
observation from Loa during the process)
Newly proposed:
"
The scope of RFC 6425 encompasses fault detection and isolation for P2M
Authors,
You may have missed the comment from Robert (alternatively I may have missed
your answer).
Probably the adoption call would be a good time to answer the questions from
the WG.
Could you please have a look at the comment and provide an answer?
Thanks,
--Bruno
From: spring On Behalf
Dear authors,
Thank you for your draft.
I've done a review of your document. (with multiple interruptions, hopefully
the comments will be consistent...)
Please find below some comments.
Abstract
" This document describes SRv6 and MPLS/SR-MPLS interworking and co-
existence procedures. »
Dear WG:
This message starts a three-week adoption call for
draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking, ending on August/1rst.
(The third week is to account for the busy IETF week.)
>From the Abstract:
This document describes SRv6 and MPLS/SR-MPLS interworking and co- existence
procedures.
P
Dear authors and contributors:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to this draft?
If so, has it been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
BCP78 and BCP79 for more details)? For any undisclosed IPR, please
provide any additional information you think appropriate.
If you are listed
