It seems that the attachment were blocked(1 XML file and 1 Diff html file).
The diff html file seems ok in the email to Bruno, so I added it once more here.
I may try to use Github link to share the diff next time to avoid sending
attachments to the list.
Thanks,
Cheng
From: Cheng Li
Sent: Mon
Hi Bruno,
Yes, you are correct.
I found out that the text of P-flag in IANA was deleted in revision 05, but I
did not mean to delete it, so it might be a mistake.
I added it back in the latest revision in attachments, please see the diff,
hope it can address your comments.
This is the revision
Cheng, SPRING WG
> From: Cheng Li
> Sent: Monday, September 2, 2024 5:46 PM
> To: spring@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segm...@ietf.org
> Subject: [spring] Request for MORE reviews of
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09
>
>
> Hi SPRING,
>
> The SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has be
Hi SPRING,
The SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been published as RFC9545, and we think the
content of SRv6 Path Segment draft is quite stable and mature, so we hope to
see more tech reviews on it so that we can move the draft forward.
The draft is quite simple and straightforward, and it defines
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) WG of the
IETF.
Title: Path Segment for SRv6 (Segment Routing in IPv6)
Authors: Cheng Li
Weiqiang Cheng
Mach(Guoyi) Chen
